| | |  | Sausage | Home » » » » Snackwell's Creme Sandwich Cookies (1.7-Ounce), 4-Count Single-Serve Packages (Pack of 48) | | | | | | | Description: | | Snackwell's Creme Sandwich from Kraft Foods, the classic crunchy cookies filled with vanilla cream. These delicious snacks are cholesterol free and are perfect for dunking in milk | | | Features: | |
• Case of 48 1.7-ounce bags of sandwich cookies (81.6 total ounces)
• Crunchy cookies with a layer of vanilla cream; four cookies per bag
• Cholesterol-free; no trans fats; low in calories
• Classic sandwich cookie taste with none of that guilt
• Perfect for dunking in milk
| | | Product Details: | | | Product Weight:
| 81.6 Ounces | | Package Length:
| 9.8 inches | | Package Width:
| 9.6 inches | | Package Height:
| 6.4 inches | | Package Weight:
| 6.15 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
| based on 12 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
 Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
GREAT COOKIES IF THEY ARE FRESH!Jul 25, 2010 Nabisco Snack Wells Creme Sandwich Cookies 1.7 oz. (Pack of 12) 20.4 oz. net
I purchased these cookies in the store several times and thought they were a great alternative to other indulgences. When I saw them on Amazon, I thought it would be a super savings. However, these cookies must be fresh, or they are simply not worth eating. The photo above is a very good sample of some very old and dried out cookies. When they were received in fresh condition, they were excellent, with soft moist cake and marshmallow and a chocolate coating that was a solid, shiney dark brown. In this photo above you can see a very dried out product with an old and pale, discolored coating. I ordered 3 seperate times, 1st box was "great" other two were not even edible. 1 FOR 3 MAKES THEM A VERY POOR VALUE.Nabisco Snack Wells Creme Sandwich Cookies 1.7 oz. (Pack of 12) 20.4 oz. net
Snackwell CookiesJun 07, 2010 The most convenient way to buy and use cookies. I like the fact that I do not have to open a whole box to have two cookies.
Yummy cookiesMay 16, 2010 I remember seeing these cookies and imagining how nasty they must taste. I tempted myself into trying some and was quite delighted. Granted, they are not the best cookies (that title belongs to Keebler's Soft Batch) but they are certainly an excellent substitute for those who like to eat cookies and not worry too much about weight. They're quite expensive at the stores (between $3.5-4.5 a box) so I ordered them in bulk from Amazon which bought per box cost down to $2.50.
Not a ringer for Nabisco!Feb 21, 2010 I can't speak for anyone else, but I am most definitely not a spokesperson for Nabisco! I love these cookies. They are super yummy,not too sweet, not too "blah." They do not taste like a "diet" cookie. I like these as well, probably better, than your normal, everyday "who cares about weight" cookie.
I will say this. I am not a fan of marshmallow. I don't like marshmallow peeps, marshmallow in cookies, marshmallow "moon pies," any of that. I DO however, like the marshmallow in these cookies. So that said, it means the marshmallow in the Snackwells is very different than what you find in the above-mentioned snack/sweets. Therefore if you do like the peeps, moonpies, etc., you may or may not like the Snackwells. However, the marshmallow is such a small part of this cookie, I don't think it will matter. The star of this show is the fudgy chocolate.
For the person who felt the cookies were bad, I wonder if there could have been a small hole in the packaging and they were, in fact, stale. I don't typically have any sitting around long enough to go stale, but when I do, they do lose their positive attributes!
I think my only "complaint" about this cookie is the fact they are so good, I end up eating too many, taking away any advantage of the fewer calories they contain.
Good product at reasonable priceDec 23, 2009 This is a tasty snack with acceptable calories and nutritional values. With Amazon's "Subscribe and Save," the cost is considerably lower than at the supermarket.
| | |
|